UK A-Levels Politics Practice Exam

Equality of opportunity suggests what about societal hierarchy?

1. It must be entirely eliminated

2. It is inherently unjust

3. It is acceptable as long as it is not rigid

4. It should be promoted to benefit all

The correct answer is: It is acceptable as long as it is not rigid

The concept of equality of opportunity posits that individuals should have a fair chance to succeed based on their own abilities and efforts, rather than being hindered by social class, background, or other arbitrary factors. Therefore, the idea that societal hierarchy is acceptable as long as it is not rigid aligns with this perspective. In this context, a non-rigid hierarchy implies that individuals can move up or down based on their performance and opportunities, rather than being stuck in a predetermined position due to their circumstances. This allows for a dynamic society where meritocracy plays a significant role – individuals who work hard and possess the necessary talents can rise in status, while those who do not can fall, creating a more fluid and just social structure. This perspective maintains that while some level of hierarchy can exist, it should not be so fixed that it prevents people from advancing based on their abilities. In contrast, the ideas of complete elimination of hierarchy, viewing it as inherently unjust, or promoting it for collective benefit do not align with the fundamental understanding of equality of opportunity. These perceptions often imply a more rigid structure or represent a belief that all social stratification is negative or that societal benefits are prioritised over individual merit. Thus, the view that a non-rigid hierarchy is acceptable